Mohd. Israil v. S.E.C.L.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the MCC application seeking restoration of WP(S) No. 2476 of 2013, which was previously dismissed for want of prosecution, subject to payment of court costs.
What did the court decide?
MCC No. 49 of 2022 allowed; WP(S) No. 2476 of 2013 restored for hearing and disposal.
What the court decided
1
MCC No. 49 of 2022
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 49 of 2022
Mohd. Israil S/o Late Shri Mohd. Ismail, Aged About 51 Years, Presently Residing At C/o. Thakur Sharnam Singh, EWS/169, M.P. Nagar, Kosabadi, District Korba, Pin495677, Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
1. S.E.C.L. Through Its Chief General Manager, Office At Seepat Road, Post Box No.60, Bilaspur, Pin- 495006, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh.
2. General Manager, S.E.C.L. Kusumunda Area, P.O. Kusumunda Colliery, Pin-495454, District Korba, Chhattisgarh.
3. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chief Secretary, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for restoration of WP(S) No. 2476 of 2013 dismissed for want of prosecution should be allowed.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mohd. Israil S/o Late Shri Mohd. Ismail
- respondent
S.E.C.L. Through Its Chief General Manager
- respondent
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chief Secretary
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · May
- Registered
- Case no.
- MCC/49/2022
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court