The High Court of Chhattisgarh condoned a 172-day delay in filing an application under Order XLIX Rule 5 CPC for restoration of First Appeal No. 25 of 2005, subject to deposit of Rs. 1000/- with the High Court Bar Association.
Condonation of delay in filing the application for restoration; deposition of Rs. 1000/-.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCC No. 464 of 2020
---- Respondent
For applicant : Ms. Seema Singh, Advocate. For Respondent : Mr. Aakash Shrivastava, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board
06/12/2022
Page 2 of 2
applicant contended that it is a belated one and the applicant has not taken interest to prosecute the appeal, therefore, it should not be desirable to restore the appeal to its original number and the delay in filing the restoration application may not be condoned.
Sd/(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Amita
1 issue framed by the court
Whether delay in filing an application for restoration of appeal can be condoned.
Late Ram S/o Mukhi Ram
Rajkumar S/o Ramlal
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
