This family appeal was withdrawn by the appellant after an out-of-court settlement between the parties. The High Court accordingly disposed of two connected family appeals as withdrawn on 09/12/2022.
Both family appeals disposed as withdrawn by the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
FA(MAT) No. 114 of 2022
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondent
FA(MAT) No. 80 of 2022
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondent
| 09/12/2022 | Shri Govind Prasad Dewangan, Counsel for the Appellant. |
|---|---|
| Ms. Prachi Singh, Counsel for the Respondent. | |
| Heard. | |
| Learned counsel for the appellant submits that both the | |
| parties have amicably settled their dispute outside the court and the |
| appellant do not want to prosecute the appeal. | |
|---|---|
| In view of such submission, both the appeals are disposed off as withdrawn. |
|
Sd/- Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) (N. K. Chandravanshi) Judge Judge |
|
| Jyoti |
Swati @ Rani Dewangan
Parasram @ Akash Dewangan
Swati Dewangan
Parasram Dewangan
Goutam Bhaduri
N. K. Chandravanshi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
