Appellant failed to file representation on two occasions. Court dismissed the FA petition for want of prosecution, deeming appellant to have no interest in contesting the case.
Case dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
FA No. 99 of 2014
---- Appellant
Versus
---- Respondents
For Appellant : None. For Respondent No.1 : Mr. H.B. Agrawal, Sr. Advocate along with Ms. Preeti Yadav, Advocate. For State/Res. No.2 : Mr. Sanjeev Agrawal, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Arvind Singh Chandel
Order on Board
19/07/2022
Sd/(Arvind Singh Chandel) Judge
Vasant
Kashiram S/o Prem Sahu
Bhupendra S/o Premlal Tamrakar
State of Chhattisgarh through The Collector, Durg
Arvind Singh Chandel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
