Appeal filed by Manisha Jain against a lower court decision. The appellant appeared through counsel but provided no instructions. Due to lack of prosecution, the appeal was dismissed.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
FA No. 31 of 2018
---- Appellant
Versus
Respondents Are Lrs Of Smt. Ratan Bai, W/o Kanwar Lal
---- Respondents
| 02/11/2022 | Shri RK Pali, Counsel for the Appellant. Heard. Learned counsel for the appellant pleads no instructions. Since no other counsel is appearing to press this appeal nor any representation is made, this Court is left with no other option except to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. |
|---|---|
| Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for want of prosecution. | |
| SD/- SD/- SD/ SD/ |
|
| - - (Goutam Bhaduri) (Radhakishan Agrawal) Judge Judge |
|
| ashu/Jyoti |
Manisha Jain W/o Laxmichand Jain
Anurag Agrawal
Naresh Baid
Ramesh Baid
Goutam Bhaduri
Radhakishan Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
