Revision against an interim maintenance order of Rs. 2,000 per month. High Court held no illegality or perversity and dismissed the revision at the admission stage.
The revision was dismissed at the admission stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRR No. 102 of 2022
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Non-Applicant
For Applicant : Shri Tarun Dansena, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya Order on Board
27.01.2022
Page 2 of 2
applicant without any just and reasonable cause, the applicant is earning only Rs. 11,670/-per month and after monthly expenditure he can save up to Rs. 1700/-. The nonapplicant/wife is highly educated lady and she can earn her livelihood. In these circumstances, the impugned order of the Family Court is liable to be set-aside.
Sd/(Gautam Chourdiya) Judge
Nadim
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the Family Court committed an illegality in granting interim maintenance to the wife who was living separately.
Whether the High Court should interfere with the Family Court order appointing legal representative though the applicant was served by post.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Kislay Kishor Gupta
Smt. Juli Kumar Gupta
Gautam Chourdiya
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
