Petitioner challenged an impugned order refusing to quash criminal proceedings for alleged forgery. The High Court, noting the trial court was already fixed for evidence, dismissed the revision petition without engaging in substantial analysis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 892 of 2022
Ramjeet Sahu S/o Baijnath Sahu Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Nakna, Police Station And Tahsil Ramanujnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. H.A.P.S. Bhatia, Advocate For State : Mr. Arjit Tiwari, Panel Lawyer
Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri
Order On Board
17.06.2022
Heard.
2
copy of sale deed with an interpolation and addition. The said fact came to fore when the certified copy of the original sale deed was obtained from the Sub Registrar Office and there was difference in description of the sale deed. Consequently, a report was made.
Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri
ashok
Ramjeet Sahu
State Of Chhattisgarh
Ramniwas Sahu
Goutam Bhaduri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
