This order condones a delay of 51 days for filing an acquittal appeal by the State and grants leave to appeal, directing registration of the appeal and notice to respondents.
Delay of 51 days was condoned; leave to appeal was allowed; the appeal was registered as Acquittal Appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CRMP No. 435 of 2020
State Of Chhattisgarh Versus Vijay Kumar Suryavanshi & Ors
| 11.01.2022 | Ms. Reena Singh, PL for the State. |
|---|---|
| None for the respondents. Heard on IA No.1/2020 – application for condonation of delay, occurred in filing of the appeal. There is delay of 51 days in filing this appeal. Considering the reasons assigned in the application and in view of the judgment of Hon’ble Supreme Court in State of Haryana Vs. Chandra Mani & Ors. Reported in (1996) 3 SCC 132, cited in the application, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Also heard on application for grant of leave to appeal. Upon due consideration application for leave to appeal is considered andallowed. Let the appeal filed by the State be registered as Acquittal Appeal and be listed for further orders. Issue notice to respondents/accused. PF be paid as per rules. Thereafter, post the matter for hearing on admission. |
|
| Sd/- (Deepak Kumar Tiwari) Judge |
Ajay
2 issues framed by the court
Whether condonation of delay of 51 days in filing the appeal is justified on the grounds assigned by the appellants.
Whether leave to file the acquittal appeal under CRMP No. 435 of 2020 should be granted.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
State of Haryana Vs. Chandra Mani & Ors.Referred¶11
State of Haryana Vs. Chandra Mani & Ors. Reported in (1996) 3 SCC 132 · Who else cites this
State Of Chhattisgarh
Vijay Kumar Suryavanshi & Ors
Deepak Kumar Tiwari
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
