The Bilaspur High Court allowed the application for condonation of delay and granted leave to appeal under Section 378(4) CrPC 1973, registering the case as a regular Acquittal Appeal.
Delay condoned; leave to appeal allowed; case registered as regular Acquittal Appeal; notice returned in six weeks; list in April 2023.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order Sheet
CRMP No. 1631 of 2022
Anup Kumar Pandey Versus Kabir Dwivedi
| 2-12-2022 | 7- Mrs. Prabha Sharma, counsel for the petitioner. None for the respondent/accused. Heard on I.A.No.1 of 2022 which is an application for condonation of delay in filing the instant petition. On due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, I.A.No. 1 of 2022 is allowed and delay is condoned. Also heard on application for grant of leave to appeal filed under Section378(4) of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973. On due consideration the application for grant of leave to appeal is allowed. Registry is directed to register the case as regular Acquittal Appeal. Admit. Issue notice to the respondent on payment of PF within a week. Notice be made returnable in six weeks. Call for the records of the court below List this case in the month of April 2023. Sd/- (Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge |
|---|
Raju
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to condone delay in filing the appeal.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Anup Kumar Pandey
Kabir Dwivedi
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
