Nilkanth Pandurang Kolhekar v. Union Of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The appeal was dismissed as it abated due to the appellant's death without an application for substitution of legal heirs being filed.
What did the court decide?
Null
The appeal was dismissed as it abated due to the appellant's death without an application for substitution of legal heirs being filed.
Null
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRA No. 1367 of 2016
---- Appellant
Versus
| For Appellant |
: Shri Pragalbha Sharma, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respondent/CBI | : Shri Himanshu Pandey, Advocate |
| appears on behalf of Shri B. Gopa | |
| Kumar, Advocate |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput Order on Board
20.07.2022
Sd/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput) Judge
Kamde
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an appeal abates due to failure to file an application for substitution of legal heirs after the death of the appellant.
Nilkanth Pandurang Kolhekar
Union Of India
Sachin Singh Rajput
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court