appellant No. 1 is of about 1-2 months prior to the incident. Similar statement has been made by PW-2, Doodhnath, brother, who in his statement stated that his father made complaint to father of appellant No. 1 that the deceased was being harassed by appellants for demand of dowry. PW-3, father of deceased, in his evidence has made allegation against appellants that she was being harassed telling her that elder brother of appellant No. 1 got five-acre of land in dowry. He also stated that appellant No. 1 first came to bring his wife but he did not send her along with him because he wanted to make some complaint to father of appellant No. 1. PW-4, Raghunath Prasad, who is neighbor of parental house of deceased, in his evidence made allegation that the deceased informed him that appellant No. 1 has not received vehicle or TV. Shiv Prasad, PW-8, uncle of deceased also made allegation that she was being harassed by appellants. PW-9, Shiv Kumar Yadav levelled allegation that appellant No. 1 has stated him to inform parents of deceased for giving vehicle in dowry. He further stated that after 1-2 months he received information of falling of deceased into the well.
