Disposed
Sharad Goyal v. Shri Amrendra Mishra
Chhattisgarh HCCONT/994/2018
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 994 of 2018…
What the court decided
AI extract
CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR CONT No. 994 of 2018…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CONT No. 994 of 2018
Sharad Goyal S/o S/o Shri Shushil Kumar Agrawal Aged About 27 Years R/o H. No. 97, Jalvihar Colony, Raipur, District Raipur, (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Shri K. Rohan, Advocate
For Respondents : Shri Himanshu Kumar Sharma, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board
06.12.2022
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Ashish
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition should continue given that a Section 156(3) IPC application was filed and cognizance taken.
Whether to direct the Judicial Magistrate to decide the Section 156(3) application.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sharad Goyal
Shri Amrendra Mishra
Shri Yadu Sidar
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court