Disposed

Nahru Prasad Jangde v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC3 Mar 2021WPS/872/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a writ petition regarding non-release of annual increment, the High Court directed the petitioner to file a detailed representation with departmental authorities within 15 days, leaving the merits of the claim for administrative consideration.

What did the court decide?

Directed petitioner to file a detailed representation with respondents within 15 days; respondents to consider and decide within 90 days.

Nahru Prasad Jangde Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 872 of 2021

¶5

Nahru Prasad Jangde S/o Sukhram Jangde Aged About 61 Years Working As Assistant Grade-2, Office Of Sub- Divisional Officer, Water Resources Sub- Division No. 2, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Water Resources Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶9

The Executive Engineer Water Resources Division, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶10

The Sub- Divisional Officer Water Resources Sub- Division No. 2, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶11

---- Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr. K.P. Sahu, Advocate For State : Mr. Kapil Maini, Panel Lawyer

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

¶14

03/03/2021

¶15

The claim of the petitioner in the present writ petition is to the nonreleasing of the annual increment which the petitioner should have got on completion of 1 year's of service.

¶16

According to the petitioner, he was appointed on compassionate ground on 15.01.1988 and since then the petitioner is working continuously with the department and though 30-32 years have passed, the petitioner till date has not received any annual increment.

¶17

Perusal of the record would show that petitioner has not made any representation to the authorities in the department ventilating his

¶18

¶19

grievance and has now after 30 years rush to this Court for an appropriate relief.

¶20

Given the said facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner make a detailed representation to the respondent No. 2 & 3 within a period of 15 days from today and on receipt of the said representation respondents No. 2 & 3 shall consider the representation of the petitioner and pass a suitable order in accordance with the rules governing the service conditions of the petitioner. In case, if the petitioner is entitled under the rules then appropriate order be passed at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶21

With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

¶22

Sd/(P. Sam Koshy) Judge

¶23

Ved

Nahru Prasad Jangde v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Nahru Prasad Jangde v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

State of Chhattisgarh Vs Bahoran Kumbhkar

Swarup Dutta Roy Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Swaran Kaur Bamrah Vs South Eastern Coalfields Limited

Mukesh Kumar Choudhary Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Reena Sen Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dhansai Sidar Vs State of Chhattisgarh