Allowed

Mrs. Nivedita Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC28 Oct 2021WPS/5929/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners, local body lecturers, filed a writ petition seeking arrears of revised pay-scale benefits from their dates of initial entitlement, alleging the state paid them only prospectively. The court disposed of the matter directing respondents to clear arrears.

What did the court decide?

Respondents directed to clear arrears of revised pay-scale benefits within 90 days or pay the same with 10% per annum interest if not released.

Mrs. Nivedita Verma Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

-1-

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

Writ Petition (S) No. 5929 of 2021

¶5

1. Mrs. Nivedita Verma W/o Mr. P.C. Verma Aged About 40 Years Post Lecturer (Local Body), Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Nathiya, Nawagaon, Block Kanker, Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker Chhattisgarh

¶6

2. Mrs. Archana Rajak W/o Mr. Yogesh Rajak Aged About 36 Years Post Lecturer (Local Body) Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Nathiya Nawagaon, Block Kanker Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker, Chhattisgarh.

¶7

3. Mrs. Ranita Roy W/o Mr. Vijayendra Roy Aged About 43 Years Post Lecturer (Local Body) Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Sidesar, Block Kanker Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.).

¶8

---Petitioner(s)

¶9

Versus

¶10

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through School Education Department, 1st Floor Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhavan, Naya Raipur Attal Nagar Distt. Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

2. Director Public Education 1st Floor Block 3 , Indravati Bhavan, Naya Raipur, Attal Nagar, Distt. Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶12

3. Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat, Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.)

¶13

4. Chief Executive Office Janpad Panchayat Uttar Baster Kanker (C.G.)

¶14

5. Secretary Panchayat And Rural Department Mahanadi Bhavan Naya Raipur, Distt Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶15

6. District Education Officer Distt. Uttar Baster Kanker C.G.

¶16

---Respondents

¶17

For Petitioner	: Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate.
For State	: Shri Mateen Siddiue,Dy. Advocate General.

¶18

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board

¶19

28.10.2021

¶20

1. The limited grievance that the petitioners have raised in the present writ petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondents to comply with the order Annexure P/1 from the effective date as reflected in the said order.

¶21

2. According to the petitioners, the benefits of revised pay-scale, which was payable to the petitioners on completion of 8 years of service in-terms-of the circular of the respondents, was ordered to be paid to the petitioners vide Annexure P/1 dated 22.02.2020. It is specifically shown that the

¶22

-2-

¶23

petitioners are entitled for the same from 16.06.2014, 03.08.2013 and 03.01.2017 respectively. However, the petitioners have not been given the benefits from the said date but have been given the benefits only prospectively from the date of issuance of the order dated 22.02.2020. The Petitioner's claim is for the arrears of payment of the said revised payscale for the period from 16.06.2014, 03.08.2013 and 03.01.2017 till the payment was made in February 2020.

¶24

3. Given the limited grievance that the petitioners have, subject to verification of the facts so far as entitlement is concerned, the present writ petition at this juncture is disposed off directing the respondents No. 2 to 4 to ensure that the benefit of Annexure P/1 as ordered is extended in its letter and spirit by clearing the arrears of payment at the earliest preferably within a period of 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

¶25

4. If the arrears are not released within the stipulated period of 90 days, the entire amount of arrears shall carry interest @ 10% per annum from the date of the order dated 22.02.2020, till the actual payment is made.

¶26

5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

¶27

Sd/(P. Sam Koshy) Judge

¶28

inder

Mrs. Nivedita Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Nivedita Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Kusumlata Sidar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shanker Dayal Singh Kanwar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Anita Pawar Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shri Anil Kumar Dwivedi Vs Secretary Vidhan Sabha Sachivalaya

Kumar Nagendra Dixena Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mini Garg Vs High Court of Chhattisgarh