machine as Radiographer from 29.012.2004. Petitioner worked as 'X-ray Technician' from the year 2004 till 2012. Respondent No.2 issued an advertisement on 18.05.12 for appointment of 'Eye Assistant, Radiographer & Staff Nurse'. Pursuant to advertisement, after seeking permission from the Competent Authority, petitioner submitted his application form for the post of Radiographer. Upon completion of recruitment proceeding, petitioner could not find his name in select list of Radiographer, hence, he made represention to respondent No.2 on 03.09.12 which remained un-decided. Petitioner posses all the requisite qualification as prescribed in the advertisement (Annexure P/1). He also possessed certificate of Para Medical Course of X-ray Technician. Under Clause 21 of advertisement, it is mentioned that candidates, who are working on contract prior to issuance of advertisement, shall be provided two additional marks of experience for each completed year, maximum upto 10 marks. Petitioner being an employee of Health Department and discharging duties of 'X-ray Technician' since 2004 continuously is entitled for 10 additional marks in view of Clause 22 of the advertisement, but the same is not awarded to him. It is further contended that in advertisement there is no mention that candidate claiming additional marks should hold permanent post. Petitioner should have been granted additional 10 marks and after adding 10 marks in total marks obtained by petitioner, his candidature ought to have been considered for the post of Radiogrpaher.
