Allowed

Thanee Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC17 Jun 2021WPS/2489/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed a writ petition filed by a petitioner declared ineligible for a teacher recruitment process due to obtaining degree and diploma in the same academic session. The Court disposed of the case in similar terms to a connected matter following a Directorate order permitting such candidates.

What did the court decide?

The Petitioner shall not be treated as ineligible for the recruitment process and shall be considered for the post in accordance to his own merits.

Thanee Sahu Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Education and Admissions | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

Writ Petition (S) No. 2489 of 2021

¶5

Thanee Sahu S/o Shri Jagdish Prasad Sahu, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Near Kendriya Vidyalaya, Mahavir Park Road, BTI Road, Post Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, School Education Department Ministry, Mahanadi Bhawan, Po And PS Rakhi, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

2. Director, Directorate Of Public Instruction, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶10

3. Joint Director, Department Of Higher Education, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

¶11

---- Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner : Mr. Ishan Verma, Advocate For State : Mr. Rahul Jha, Govt. Advocate

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board

¶14

17.06.2021

¶15

1. Learned Counsel appearing on either side submit that the issue involved in the instant case stands covered by a bunch of Writ Petitions disposed of by this Court on 01.03.2021, i.e. WPS No. 5157/2020 (Manoj Kumar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters.

¶16

2. It is a case where the Petitioner was declared ineligible for participation

¶17

¶18

in the recruitment process for the post of Teacher on the ground that the Petitioner had obtained degree and diploma in the same academic session. On 1.3.2021, when the aforesaid bunch of Writ Petitions were came up for hearing, learned Counsel for Petitioner had produced an order of the Directorate, Public Instructions, dated 15.2.2021, wherein the Directorate, Public Instructions has granted approval on a decision to permit the candidates who have done their degree and diploma in the same academic session and that those candidates who have done their degree and diploma in the same academic session would not be treated as ineligible for the said recruitment process.

¶19

3. Given the said development and on the basis of the bunch of Writ Petitions that was disposed of by this Court on 1.3.2021, i.e. WPS No. 5157/2020 (Manoj Kumar Vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Others) and other connected matters, the present case also being identical stands disposed of in similar terms to the extent that in the light of the decision of the Directorate of Public Instructions dated 15.2.2021, the Petitioner shall not be treated as ineligible for the said recruitment process and he shall be considered for the said post in accordance to his own merits other than the said factor of having done degree and diploma in the same academic session.

¶20

4. Writ Petition thus stands allowed and is disposed of accordingly.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

P. Sam Koshy Judge

¶23

Khatai

Thanee Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Thanee Sahu v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sukhdev Patel Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

N. K. Sur Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Dr. Smt. Madhuri Wankhede, Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Tejram Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Hausla Prasad Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shiv Sankar Navik Vs State of Chhattisgarh