The High Court of Chhattisgarh directed Respondent No.2 to consider and decide the petitioner's pending representation for compassionate appointment within 60 days, while expressly reserving opinion on the merits.
Direction to Respondent No.2 to consider and decide the pending representation for compassionate appointment within 60 days.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Writ Petition (S) No.1778 of 2019
Sudhir Kumar Dixit, S/o Late Shri Ram Kumar Dixiti, aged about 27 years, R/o Vinoba Nagar, Gali No.R/2, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner: Mr. V.K. Pandey, Advocate. For Respondents/State: -
Mr. Amrito Das, Additional Advocate General and Mr. Neeraj Pradhan, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
06/12/2021
2
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Soma
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the directions to the respondent authority to decide the pending compassionate appointment representation within 60 days constitute a finally disposed order.
Sudhir Kumar Dixit
State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Secretary, Sports and Youth Welfare Department
Commissioner, Sports and Youth Welfare Department
Inspector General of Police, Bilaspur
Superintendent of Police, Raigarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
