Writ petition challenging absorption of respondent No.3's service was rejected. The court held the petition suffered from inordinate delay and laches as the petitioner was an absorbed employee for over a decade without objection. The order of absorption was deemed final.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPS No. 1758 of 2021
Vijay Kumar Kosta S/o Late H. L. Kosta Aged About 49 Years R/o G-1/12 G A D Colony, Kancha, Shankar Nagar, Raipur Police Station Khamardeeh, Tahsil Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Akath Kumar Yadav, Advocate For State : Mr. Rahul Jha, Govt. Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy
Order on Board
09/04/2021
-2-
got absorbed in the year 2009. It is this absorption of the private respondent No.3, which is under question in the present writ petition .
Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge
Ved
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the High Court should entertain a writ petition challenging the absorption of an employee's service filed after a delay of over a decade.
Whether ultimate acceptability suffices to meet the requirements of delay and laches in service matters.
Vijay Kumar Kosta
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, General Administration Department
Secretary Of State Election Commission
Balram Dewangan
P. Sam Koshy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
