The writ petition was disposed of as infructuous at the outset due to submission by the petitioner that most grievances had been resolved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WP PIL No.46 of 2021
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP PIL No. 46 of 2021
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Shri Rakesh Pandey, Advocate For Respondent /State : Shri Satish Chandra Verma, Advocate General and Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Addl. Advocate General with Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. Advocate General and Shri Vikram Sharma, Dy. Govt. Adv. for the State.
For Respondent/UOI : Shri Ramakant Mishra, Asstt. SG
2
WP PIL No.46 of 2021
(Proceedings through Video Conferencing)
Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag. CJ
Hon'ble Smt. Rajani Dubey. J.
Order On Board
By
Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag. CJ.
08-07-2021
Sd/Sd/-
(Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Rajani Dubey) Acting Chief Justice Judge
Gowri
Varunendra Mishra
State of Chhattisgarh
Union of India
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Rajani Dubey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
