State Of Chhattisgarh And Ors. v. Shriram And Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a Labour Court award granting reinstatement without backwages. Having found that the petitioner had reinstated and regularized the worker during the pendency of this petition, the Court held the award warranted no interference.
What the court decided
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR
WPL No. 11 of 2015
1. State Of Chhattisgarh, through The Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh (The petitioner no.1 was not a party before the learned Labour Court but has been impleaded as petitioner no.1 in the instant petition as the proper course is to implead the State Government through the Secretary of the concerned department)
2. The Executive Engineer R.B.C. Hasdeo Barrage, Water Resources Department, Rampur, Korba, District Korba, (CG)
3. The Sub Divisional Officer, Hasdeo Barrage, Water Management Sub Division Darri, District Korba, (C.G.)
---- Petitioner
Versus
1. Shriram and Anr. S/o Dukhi Ram aged about 42 Years R/o Purani Basti Darri, PS Darri, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba, Chhattisgarh
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the writ petition challenging the Labour Court award for reinstatement warrants interference given the worker's subsequent regularization.
Whether the present verdict of the labour court on reinstatement requires interference in view of the subsequent regularization of the respondent-worker.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
State Of Chhattisgarh
- respondent
Shriram and Anr.
Coram
P. Sam Koshy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- WPL/11/2015
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court