Pankaj Gangwani v. State Of Chhattisgarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners appeared absent. The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution due to lack of representation.
Petitioners appeared absent. The High Court dismissed the writ petition for want of prosecution due to lack of representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 2
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPCR No. 62 of 2018
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioners : None. For State : Shri Devendra Pratap Singh, Dy. Advocate General Respondent No.2 : Shri Manoj Pranjpe, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board
05.07.2021
Page 2 of 2
Sd-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
Judge
kishore
Pankaj Gangwani
Piyush Gangwani
Ramchand Gangwani
Seema Gangwani
State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Home
Smt. Reshma Gangwani
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court