In WPCR No. 251 of 2017, the petitioner sought direction to register an FIR against respondents No. 9 and 10. The court held the petition infructuous as an FIR had already been registered against them and dismissed the matter.
None. The petition was dismissed for having become infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPCR No. 251 of 2017
---- Respondents
--------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For petitioner : Mr. Punit Ruparal, Advocate. For State. : Mr. Sudeep Verma, Dy. Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order on Board
2
17-06-2021
Sd/-
(Narendra Kumar Vyas)
Judge
Raju
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition should be dismissed as it has become infructuous due to the subsequent registration of FIR against respondents No. 9 and 10.
Budhiyaro W/o Janak Ram
State of Chhattisgarh
Director General Of Police, Raipur
Inspector General Of Police, Range Koriya
Superintendent Of Police, Koriya
The District Magistrate, Koriya
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
