The Bench held a single hearing via video conferencing. The petitioner's counsel submitted that the writ petition had become infructuous due to the elapse of time. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WPC No. 2439 of 2020
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Manish Upadhyay, Adv. For State/Respondent No. 1 : Mr. Mateen Siddiqui, Dy. A.G.
DB : Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Acting C.J. Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey
Per: Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Acting C.J.
05.07.2021
Proceedings through video conferencing.
Sd/Sd/(Prashant Kumar Mishra) (Rajani Dubey) Acting Chief Justice Judge
V/-
M/s Radheshyam Agrawal Through Partner Sanjay Agrawal
State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Public Works Department
Bilaspur Smart City Through Its Managing Director
Prakash Asphaltings And Toll Highways (India) Limited
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Rajani Dubey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
