A writ petition filed in the High Court of Chhattisgarh was dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner appeared neither in person nor through counsel on multiple occasions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WP227 No. 827 of 2011
---- Petitioner
Versus
For Petitioner – None.
For State/Respondent No.14 – Smt. Hamida Siddiqi, Deputy Advocate General.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order on Board
06-08-2021
-2-
the petitioner's side.
petition for want of prosecution.
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Aadil
Chaman Lal Sahu
Lawan Kumar
Naresh Kumar
Jageshwar Kumar Sahu
Savitri
Kusum Bai
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
