The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed an applicant's revision petition challenging a Family Court order dismissing an amendment application. Finding no error in the lower court's order, the High Court disposed of the writ at the motion stage.
Writ petition dismissed and disposed off at motion stage as no error was found in the impugned order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
W.P.(227) No. 71 of 2018
Manish Verma, S/o. Sadhuram Verma, aged about 35 years, R/o. World Bank Colony, MIG-1, 1744, Housing Board Jamul, Bhilai District Durg Chhattisgarh.
---- Applicant
Versus
Annpurna Verma, W/o. Shri Manish Verma, aged about 30 years, R/o. Plot No. 08, House No. 621/17, Awadhpuri, Risali Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh.
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. Sudhir Verma, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order On Board
13/08/2021
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Balram
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order dismissing the application for amendment by the Family Court warrants interference in writ proceedings.
Manish Verma
Annpurna Verma
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
