As per the direction of the writ Court, specific affidavit has been filed by 3rd Respondent, that respondent 3 has not issued any letter like Annexure P-3. Appellants have not controverted the contents of the affidavit by filing counter affidavit. Appellants who have created a false and forged document, claiming the relief, are not entitled for any relief as sought for by them. Appellants at no point of time were permitted to occupy the newly constructed shops by Respondent 3 near bus stand area Baloda Bazar, but they after breaking open the locks took illegal possession of the shops. Due to interim order passed in their favour, Respondent 4 to 16, who became successful on draw of lot, could not get the possession of the shops. Appellants are law breakers. He further pointed out that as per the list Annexure P-7 placed on record, it is clear that only name of two of the appellants find place in that list which shows that the appellants have not approached this Court with clean hands. As reflected from Annexure P-4, under the Yojana, several shops were constructed by Respondent 3 ie. 50+14 which are to be allotted to the persons who made applications and became successful in the proceedings of allotment.
