The Division Bench dismissed the writ appeal at the motion stage. The court refused to consider the argument that pension cannot be granted to more than one person, as it was not open to do so in teeth of a final order from the coordinate bench in WA No. 480 of 2018.
The present writ appeal is dismissed at the motion stage itself.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
WA No.170 of 2021
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
WA No. 170 of 2021
---- Appellant Versus
Respondents No.4 & 5 are Minor Through Mother Smt. Rekha Mishra (Respondent No.3)
---- Respondents
For Appellant: Shri Vipin Tiwari, Advocate
For Respondent /State : Shri Vikram Sharma, Dy. Govt. Advocate
(Proceedings through Video Conferencing)
Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag. CJ
Hon'ble Smt. Rajani Dubey. J.
2
WA No.170 of 2021
Order On Board
By
Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag. CJ.
07-07-2021
3
WA No.170 of 2021
favour of the second wife. So far as, share of pension and other post retrial dues are concerned that will be decided according the declaration made by High Court in Civil Revision Nos.172 of 2017 and 181 of 2017 in the judgment dated 12.02.2018.
Sd/Sd/-
| (Prashant Kumar Mishra) | (Rajani Dubey) |
|---|---|
| Acting Chief Justice | Judge |
Gowri
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the appellant is entitled to pensionary benefits in light of the final order regarding the deceased employee's heirs.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
WA No. 480 of 2018Relied on¶28
Surekha Mishra
State of Chhattisgarh
Rekha Mishra
Prashant Kumar Mishra
Rajani Dubey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
