certificate of Gram Panchayat would reveal that the BPL card on which reliance is placed by the appellant is an outcome of fraud. He would further submit that on the earlier round of litigation, no specific direction was given by the High Court in WPS No. 6498/2007 to the extent that appellant Revati Bai should be appointed in place of Sharda Bai whereas the order of the Collector dated 29.03.2010 has wrongly noted the fact that in a petition filed by Revti Bai before the High Court, it was found that the contention of Revati Bai in WPS No.841/2007 was correct and directed for appointment of Revati Bai. Therefore, the initial appointment order of Revati Bai itself has suffered illegality which has been rectified by the learned single Judge. He would further submit that while setting aside the appointment of Sharda Bai, no opportunity of hearing was given to her. The order would show that in continuation on wrong premises, the order of appointment of Revati Bai was passed. Therefore, the order of learned Single Judge is well merited and does not call for any interference.
