Syed Ahmed v. Mohd. Israel
Case brief
What is this about?
High Court at Bilaspur dismissed the second appeal of Syed Ahmed as withdrawn by means of an intervening application, vacating interim relief.
What did the court decide?
The instant second appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
SA No. 580 of 2018 |
||
|---|---|---|
• Syed |
Ahmed S/o Late Shri Jharudd |
in, Aged |
About |
55 Years R/o Charcha Collie |
ry Area, |
P.O CKoriya |
harcha Tehsil Baikunthpur,Chhattisgarh............(Plai----Versus |
Districtntiff)Appellant |
1. Mohd.Years; |
Israel S/o Mohd. Isak, Aged |
About 55 |
2. Mohd.Years; |
Israfel, S/o Mohd. Isak, Aged |
About 50 |
3. Mohd.Years; |
Ashfaq, S/o Mohd. Isak, Aged |
About 47 |
The a |
bove respondents No.1 to 3 |
are R/o |
Charch |
a Colliery Area, P.O Charch |
a Tehsil |
BaikunChhatt |
thpur,Districtisgarh..........(Defendants). |
Koriya |
4. Mohd.Years; |
Saleem S/o Mohd. Ibrahim Aged |
About 47 |
5. Mohd.Years; |
Kaleem S/o Mohd. Ibrahim Aged |
About 33 |
6. Mohd.Years; |
Haleem S/o Mohd. Ibrahim Aged |
About 28 |
7. Mohd. |
Ibrahim S/o Miyan Miya Aged |
About 63 |
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Syed Ahmed
- respondent
Mohd. Years
- respondent
Mohd. Israfel
- respondent
Mohd. Ashfaq
- respondent
Mohd. Saleem
- respondent
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Chhattisgarh HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- SA/580/2018
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court