In second appeal challenging a title declaration suit, the Division Bench dismissed the appeal without notice, holding that the factual finding regarding succession and property title by lower courts did not constitute a substantial question of law.
The second appeal is dismissed in limine without notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Second Appeal No.295 of 2007
Both are R/o Village Udata, Tah Katghora, Distt. Korba (C.G.)
(Plaintiffs) ---- Appellants
Versus
(Defendants) ---- Respondents
For Appellants/Plaintiffs:Mr. Bharat Rajput, Advocate. For Respondent No.3/State: -
Mr. Ravi Kumar Bhagat, Deputy Govt. Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
11/06/2021
2
/ plaintiffs, would submit that both the Courts below have concurrently erred in holding that the plaintiffs are not successors-in-interest of Jhagru Singh and further erred in holding that the suit land of 3.65 acres situated at Village Udata, Tahsil Katghora, District Korba, is the ancestral property of the defendants and therefore the plaintiffs are not entitled for decree of declaration of title in their favour, as such, substantial question of law be formulated for hearing the appeal.
3
is accordingly dismissed in limine without notice to the other side. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Soma
Paradeshi Ram
Lakhan Singh
Itwar Singh
Bipat Singh
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
