The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the anticipatory bail application filed by the applicant, who apprehended arrest for alleged sexual assault offences, holding it not to be a fit case for bail.
None. The application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 CrPC was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 645 of 2021
VERSUS
------- Respondent
For Applicant : Mr. Rajendra Tripathi, Advocate For Respondent- State : Ms. Anjali Singh Chouhan, P.L.
( proceedings through video conferencing )
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
ORDER
09/08/2021
2
that there was no occasion by the applicant to enter into the house and make attempt of making physical relationship, the allegation as levelled against the present applicant is false and frivolous, hence he may be enlarged on bail.
Sd/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
Pawan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is a fit case for the grant of anticipatory bail.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Bhuvneshwar Bharadwaj
State of Chhattisgarh
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
