An applicant applied for anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in a rape and false charge case. The Acting Chief Justice rejected the application, noting the applicant's misuse of position and prior corruption case. The Court declined to extend Section 438 Cr.P.C. benefits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
MCRC A No.535 of 2021
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Order reserved on 14-07-2021
Order delivered on 23-07-2021
MCRCA No. 535 of 2021
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondent
For Applicant Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate For Respondent /State Mr. Arjit Tiwari, Panel Lawyer For Objector Mr. K.P.S. Gandhi, Advocate
(Proceedings through Video Conferencing)
CAV Order
Hon'ble Mr. Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag. CJ
2
MCRC A No.535 of 2021
3
MCRC A No.535 of 2021
lady on threat of making her nude video viral as also on allurement of arranging job. They would also submit that in the event of his release on anticipatory bail, he will influence the witnesses.
Sd/-
(Prashant Kumar Mishra) Acting Chief Justice
Gowri
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the benefit of Section 438 Cr.P.C. should be extended to a government servant who allegedly misused his position to sexually exploit a prosecutrix.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Madheshwar Prasad
State Of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
