Allowed

Basant Kumar Ram v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC11 Feb 2021MCRCA/1673/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh granted anticipatory bail to the applicant in a cheating case. The court noted that while the applicant assisted in collecting funds with the promise of post recommendations, he had also been defrauded by the amount, leading to a decision in his favor.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed; anticipatory bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 50,000 with one surety, subject to specific conditions.

Basant Kumar Ram Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Cheating and Forgery | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

MCRCA No.1673 of 2020

¶3

NAFR

¶4

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶5

MCRCA No. 1673 of 2020

¶6

Basant Kumar Ram S/o Jiladhar Ram Aged About 32 Years R/o Village- Dondrahi, Post- Ranpur, Tahsil- Bagicha, Distt. Jashpur (Chhattisgarh)

¶7

---- Applicant

¶8

Versus

¶9

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House OfÏcer, Police Station- Narayanpur, Distt. Jashpur (Chhattisgarh)

¶10

----Respondent

¶11

For Applicant Shri Awadh Tripathi, Advocate. - For Respondent Shri Anshuman Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer.

¶12

Hon'ble Justice Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board

¶13

11/02/2021

¶14

The applicant has preferred this application for grant of anticipatory bail, as he apprehends his arrest in connection with Crime No.79/20, registered at Police Station Narayanpur, District- Jashpur, (C.G.) for offence punishable under Section 420, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

On the basis of report submitted by the Block Education OfÏcer, Bagicha, the instant First Information Report has been registered against five accused persons on allegation that

¶16

¶17

MCRCA No.1673 of 2020

¶18

they have collected Rs.13,47,000/- from the employees of the Bharat Mata Higher Secondary School, Ramsama, a private school, on promise that their post would be recommended for grant of aid from the State Government.

¶19

It is argued that applicant is working as a teacher in the said school and had himself has paid Rs.60,000/-, therefore, he is a victim rather than an accused.

¶20

Learned State counsel would submit that although the applicant has paid Rs.60,000/- to the management but he is also a part of a team who has collected the amount.

¶21

Having considered the material available in the case diary, particularly considering the fact that applicant has paid Rs.60,000/- to the management of the School for the same purpose for which other employees have been defrauded, I am inclined to extend the benefit of anticipatory bail to the applicant.

¶22

Accordingly, the application is allowed and it is directed that in the event of arrest of the applicant, he shall be released on anticipatory bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the arresting ofÏcer with the following conditions:-

¶23

he shall make himself available for interrogation by a police ofÏcer as and when required;

¶24

he shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement,

¶25

¶26

MCRCA No.1673 of 2020

¶27

threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police ofÏcer.

¶28

he shall not influence the witnesses during pendency of

¶29

the trial.

¶30

SD/-

¶31

(Prashant Kumar Mishra) Judge

¶32

Amardeep

Basant Kumar Ram v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Basant Kumar Ram v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Madhav Sori @ Madhav Kamar, Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Chetu Das and Another Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Durga @ Durga Kuldeep Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Parmeshwar Koshle and Others Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Roopnarayan Sahu & Others Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dinesh Prasad Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh