The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed an application seeking anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. making no order in view of the nature of allegations and material in the case diary.
Application for grant of anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRCA No. 1213 of 2021
---Applicant
Versus
---Non-applicant
For Applicant Shri Sunil Sahu, Advocate. For State Shri B.L. Sahu, Panel Lawyer.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board
05/10/2021
2
was driving the car. During the course of investigation, when memorandum statement of the co-accused Majhar Ali was recorded, he stated that he is an employee of the applicant and it is the applicant who have given cash of Rs.1 lakh with country made pistol and six cartridges to him for honour killing of Hemant Dhruv @ Takalu. Based on the seizure and further after recording statement of other witnesses, the aforementioned offence is registered against the applicant and the co-accused Majhar Ali.
3
Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
Akhilesh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in connection with offences of murder, conspiracy, and possession of arms.
3 provisions across 3 enactments
Madhu Nayar @ Raju Nayar
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
