Allowed

Kishan Netam v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC20 Oct 2021MCRC/8065/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a first bail application under Section 439 CrPC regarding illegal possession of 20 bulk liters of country made liquor, the High Court of Chhattisgarh allowed the bail, directing the furnishing of one solvent surety and a personal bond to the trial court.

What did the court decide?

Bail allowed with direction to furnish one solvent surety for Rs. 25,000 along with one personal bond of like sum to the trial court.

Kishan Netam Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Cheque Dishonour | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 8065 of 2021

¶5

Kishan Netam S/o Ramji Netam Aged About 35 Years R/o Village Mundatola, Police Station Gandai, Tahsil Chuikhadan, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh .

¶6

---- Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Excise Circle Gandai, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh., District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh .

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

For the Applicant : Shri Abhishek Sharma, Advocate For the State : Ms. Anjali Singh Chouhan, P.L.

¶11

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice N.K. Chandravanshi

¶12

Order On Board

¶13

20/10/2021

¶14

Heard.

¶15

As per applicant, this is first bail application under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. preferred by the applicant before this Court and no other bail application is pending before any other Court.

¶16

The applicant has been arrested in connection with Crime No.26/2021 registered in Police Station Excise Circle Gandai, District Rajnandgaon (CG) for offence punishable under Section 34(2) of C.G. Excise Act.

¶17

Prosecution story in brief is that on 25/09/2021, 20 bulk liter of country made liquor has been seized from the illegal possession of applicant.

¶18

Counsel for the applicant argued that the applicant is innocent, he has been falsely implicated, he is in jail since 25/09/2021, he has no previous criminal antecedent, hence he be released on bail.

¶19

On the other hand, the State counsel opposed the bail application. She further submitted that no criminal antecedent has been reported

¶20

¶21

against applicant in the case diary.

¶22

Looking to the quantity of the seized liquor and also no previous criminal antecedent of the applicant and further looking to the totality of the facts, I feel inclined to allow the bail application. It is directed that if the applicant furnishes one solvent surety for a sum of Rs.25,000/along with one personal bond in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court concerned for his appearance before the concerned Court as and when directed by the said Court, he be released on bail.

¶23

CC as per rules.

¶24

Sd/(N.K. Chandravanshi) JUDGE

¶25

Kamde

Kishan Netam v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kishan Netam v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishna Sarthi Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Dujram Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mohd. Jubair Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ramgopal Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Rajendra Kumar Gulshan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Lakhiram Bharti Vs State of Chhattisgarh