Allowed

Suresh Kumar Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC4 Oct 2021MCRC/7264/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this third bail application, the High Court of Chhattisgarh considered the applicant's plea for regular bail in a robbery-dacoity case. Noting that similarly situated co-accused had already been granted bail, the court inclined to grant regular bail.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is released on bail on executing a personal bond for Rs.50,000/- with one local surety for a like amount.

Suresh Kumar Verma Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 7264 of 2021

¶5

Suresh Kumar Verma son of Ram Lochan Verma, aged about 29 years, resident of village Firozpur, Police Station Mankapur, District Konda (U.P.)

¶6

---- Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Chhattisgarh - Through : Station House OfÏcer, P.S. Pulgaon, District Durg (C.G.)

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

For Applicant : Mr. B.P. Singh, Advocate. For Respondent. : Mr. Ishwar Jaiswal, P.L.

¶11

Hon'ble Smt. Justice Rajani Dubey

¶12

Order on Board

¶13

04/10/2021

¶14

The applicant has preferred this Third bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail as he is arrested in connection with Crime No.468/2019, registered at Police Station – Pulgaon, District Durg, (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Sections 392, 397, 395, 307, 212 and 120-B of Indian Penal Code.

¶15

First bail application of applicant was dismissed on merit, whereas second bail application was dismissed as withdrawn.

¶16

The prosecution story, in brief, is that on 26.09.2019 at about 10.00 pm, Umesh Kumar Verma, Supervisor of Jevra-Sirsa Countrymade Liquor shop, was returning his house with Rs.1,50,000/-, which was the sale collection amount of liquor shop. When Umesh Verma reached near village Kuntelabhata, three unknown persons stopped his motorcycle and on the gun point, took out key of motorcycle, snatched his mobile phone and bag in which cash of

¶17

¶18

Rs.1,50,000/- was kept. One accused person fired gun shot at Umesh Verma as a result he sustained injury on stomach. Thereafter, the accused persons ran away from the spot. Next day, one Harjinder Singh lodged complaint in the concerned police station based upon which instant crime is registered against present applicant and others.

¶19

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that similarly situated co-accused persons have already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 12.07.2021 passed in MCRC No.1334/2021 and order dated 22.09.2021 passed in MCRC No.6215/2021, therefore, the present applicant may also be granted benefit of regular bail.

¶20

Counsel for the State however opposes the application for regular bail.

¶21

Having considered the orders passed by this Court in MCRC No.1334/2021 and MCRC No.6215/2021 and looking to the nature of allegation against the applicant, which is similar that of the co-accused persons, this Court is inclined to released the applicant on regular bail.

¶22

It is directed that the Applicant shall be released on bail on his executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.50,000/- with one local surety for the like amount to the satisfaction of the trial Court for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.

¶23

Certified copy, as per rules.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

(Rajani Dubey) Judge

¶26

pkd

Suresh Kumar Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Suresh Kumar Verma v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Babu Lal Mar (Died) and Others Vs State Of Madhya Pradesh

Swayamwar Jha Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Raju @ Suraj Vs the State of M.P.

Raju Tirky Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Padmini Vs Bhanumati

Faggu Vs State of Chhattisgarh