Allowed

Sohan Lal Chaudhary v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC17 Mar 2021MCRC/710/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh, Bilaspur disposed of two.common bail applications arising from the same crime involving alleged trafficking of minor children. Considering the applicants' age, lack of antecedents, and the time remaining for trial, the Court allowed bail on a personal bond with sureties.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted on personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000 with two sureties of Rs. 50,000 each.

Sohan Lal Chaudhary Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Bail and Remand | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 9278 of 2020

¶5

Pankaj Mahakud, S/o Ramesh Mahakud, aged about 25 Years, R/o Matakambeda, Kolha Barpada, Kendujhar, Odissa.

¶6

----Applicant Versus

¶7

State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, Police Station Kota, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

¶8

----Non-applicant

¶9

MCRC No. 710 of 2021

¶10

Sohan Lal Chaudhary, S/o Sudarshan Chaudhary, age 31 Years, R/o Village Birgaon, P.S. Urla, Tehsil and District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

¶11

----Applicant

¶12

Versus

¶13

State of Chhattisgarh, Through Station House Officer, Police Station- Kota, District, Bilaspur,chhattisgarh.

¶14

----Non-applicant

¶15

For Applicants Shri K.P.S. Gandhi & Shri Vaibhav P. Shukla, Advocates. For State Shri Sudhir Sahu, P.L.

¶16

Hon'ble Shri Justice Gautam Chourdiya Order on Board

¶17

17/03/2021

¶18

As both these applications filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. arise out of the same Crime No.515/2020 registered at Police Station Kota, Bilaspur, C.G. for the offence punishable under

¶19

¶20

Sections 363, 370(5), 34 of Indian Penal Code, they are being disposed of by this common order.

¶21

Allegation against the present applicants is that they were illegally trafficking some minor children from Orrisa to Raipur for labour work by Bolero bearing registration No.OD9-A-63902 & Marazo bearing registration No. MP65-T-3555. On the basis of information received from an informant on 28.11.2020, police apprehended the accused persons and registered the above offence against them.

¶22

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that applicants are innocent persons and have been falsely implicated in this case. They submit that the allegation against the present applicants is false and baseless as they were not transporting the minor children. The applicants are in jail since 29.11.2020, charge sheet has already been filed and conclusion of trial is likely to take some time. Therefore, the applicants be released on bail.

¶23

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State opposes the bail applications.

¶24

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the case diary.

¶25

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the detention period of the applicants, who are 31 & 25 years of age, charge sheet has already been filed, the fact that the applicants have no criminal antecedent and there is no likelihood of the applicants tampering with the evidence or absconding as

¶26

¶27

admitted by both the counsel and conclusion of trial may take some time, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this Court is of the opinion that present is a fit case for grant of bail to the applicants. Accordingly, the applications are allowed. It is directed that in the event of each of the applicants executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two sureties of Rs.50,000/- each to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, they shall be released on bail on the following conditions:-

¶28

(i) they shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such fact to the Court,

¶29

(ii) they shall not act in any manner which will be prejudicial to fair and expeditious trial, and

¶30

(iii) they shall appear before the trial Court on each and every date given to them by the said Court till disposal of the trial.

¶31

(iv) they shall not involve themselves in any offence of similar nature in future or else this order granting bail to the applicants shall automatically stand cancelled without further reference to this Court.

¶32

Let a copy of this order be forwarded to the concerned police station forthwith who shall inform the trial Court in the event of applicants involving themselves in similar offence in future.

¶33

Sd/Gautam Chourdiya Judge

¶34

Akhilesh

Sohan Lal Chaudhary v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sohan Lal Chaudhary v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Jitendra Tandi @ Jitendra Jagat Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Mangal Prasad Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Kishore Kumar Meshram Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sushil Kumar Chouhan Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shekhar Nayak Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Roshan Yadav Vs State of Chhattisgarh