Allowed

Dhirendra Kumar Gautam v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC7 Dec 2021MCRC/6963/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application, the High Court granted release to the applicant arrested for severe sexual offences involving a child. The court noted the victim did not support the prosecution case and allowed bail on personal bond.

What did the court decide?

The application is allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on executing a personal bond with one surety.

Dhirendra Kumar Gautam Vs State of… — Child Sexual Offences (POCSO) | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

MCRC No. 6963 of 2021

¶5

Dhirendra Kumar Gautam S/o Kewal Prasad, Aged About 21 Years R/o Village And Thana Raghunathnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh, District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Applicant

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Raghunathnagar, District Balrampur Ramanujganj Chhattisgarh, District : Balrampur, Chhattisgarh

¶9

---- Respondent

¶10

For Applicant : Shri A.K. Yadav, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Sanjay Pathak, Panel Lawyer

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

¶12

Order On Board

¶13

07/12/2021

¶14

This is the First Bail Application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested on 18.04.2021 in connection with Crime No. 70/2021 registered at Police Station Raghunathnagar Balrampur Ramanujganj C.G. for the offence punishable under Section 363, 366, 376(2) (n) of the Indian Penal Code and section 6 of POCSO Act.

¶15

As per the prosecution case, report was lodged by the father of the victim that applicant enticed the victim and committed forceful sexual intercourse, therefore offence has been committed and FIR was lodged on 22.04.2021.

¶16

Learned counsel for the applicant submits that completely false case

¶17

¶18

was made out and because of certain earlier dispute the report was lodged. He further submits that the applicant is in jail since 18.04.2021, therefore the present applicant may be released on bail.

¶19

Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail.

¶20

The victim and the complainant are present in the Court and would submit that the applicant may be enlarged on bail and no offence has been committed.

¶21

Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records.

¶22

Perusal of statement of the victim placed on record would show that she has not supported the case of the prosecution.

¶23

Considering the submission made before the court and taking into the facts that the victim has not supported the case of the prosecution, without any further observation on the merits of the case, I am inclined to release the applicant on bail.

¶24

Accordingly, the application is allowed and the applicant is directed to be released on bail on his executing a personal bond in sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the trial Court. He is directed to appear before the trial Court on each and every date given by the said Court.

¶25

Sd/(Goutam Bhaduri) Judge

¶26

Jyoti

Dhirendra Kumar Gautam v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhirendra Kumar Gautam v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Seema Sarthe Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Omprakash Kurre Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ali Hussain Siddiqui Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Sasadhar Biswas Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Ashok Tiwari @ Baba Pandit Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Santosh Kumar Chhippi Vs State of Chhattisgarh