Single judge order dismissing bail application for illicit possession of psychotropic substances inNDPS Act. Court held commercial quantity established based on Supreme Court precedent, rejecting argument for regular bail.
Bail application dismissed; applicant not entitled to regular bail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
MCRC No. 6725 of 2020
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 6725 of 2020
---- Petitioner
Versus
---- Respondent
| For Applicant | Mr. AK Yadav, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For Respondent /State | Mr. Ravish Verma, Government Advocate |
SB.: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra
Order On Board
13/1/2021
2
MCRC No. 6725 of 2020
Hydrochloride.
Sd/-
(Prashant Kumar Mishra)
Judge
Shyna
2 issues framed by the court
Whether bail is available when an accused is found in commercial quantity of psychotropic substances.
Whether the unweighed neutral substance affects the determination of illicit possession quantity.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Hira Singh and Anr. vs. Union of India and Anr.Referred¶5
Hira Singh and Anr. vs. Union of India and Anr. in CRA No.722/2017
Hira Singh and Anr. vs. Union of India and Anr.Referred¶6
Hira Singh (supra)
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Sunil Kumar
State Of Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
