An application for regular bail under Section 439 CrPC was rejected. The High Court, noting the serious nature of allegations of murder and the deceased last seen with the applicant until after death, held that the applicant was not a fit case for bail.
Application for grant of regular bail rejected and dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 6366 of 2021
Devraj Sahu @ Golu S/o Shri Bishambhar Sahu Aged About 19 Years R/o At Ward No. 09, Mamlipara Chhura, District - Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh
---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Chhura, District - Gariyaband, Chhattisgarh., District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh
---- Respondent
For Applicant : Shri Vinay Nagdev, Advocate.
For Non-applicant : Shri Gurudev I. Sharan, Govt. Advocate
S.B.: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge ORDER
01/11/2021
-2-
commission of offence under Sections 302, 201 of IPC. During course of investigation, applicant and another co-accused were interrogated and based on their memorandum, they were arrested in the aforementioned crime.
-3-
Sd/--/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
Praveen
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail in a charge sheeted case involving murder.
Whether identification by sniffer dog squad and seizure of incriminating material at applicant's instance negates safety from flight or witness tampering.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Devraj Sahu @ Golu
State Of Chhattisgarh Through P.S. Chhura
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
