High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the applicant's bail application under Section 439 CrPC in a robbery case, holding that his identification by the complainant and seizure of a mobile phone from his possession precluded bail.
Bail application dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MCRC No. 1663 of 2021
-----Applicant
VERSUS
For Applicant : Mr. Pradeep Singh Rathore, Advocate For Non-applicant/ State : Mr. Vimlesh Bajpai, Govt. Adv.
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
( proceedings through video conferencing ) ORDER
02/08/2021
2
on the secret information, when the truck was seized near forest barrier of Gatapar, Rajnandgaon, offence under Section 395 IPC was registered against the present applicant along with others.
Sd/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
Pawan
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to regular bail in a robbery case where he was identified by the complainant and a mobile phone was seized from his possession.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Jeetu Pan @ Pappu Pan
State of Chhattisgarh
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
