Sukhnandan v. Gopendra
Case brief
What is this about?
BILASPUR M.C.C.No.206 of 2021 1. Sukhnandan…
What did the court decide?
Second Appeal No.269/2010 is restored to its original number.
BILASPUR M.C.C.No.206 of 2021 1. Sukhnandan…
Second Appeal No.269/2010 is restored to its original number.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPURM.C.C.No.206 of 2021 |
N |
AFR |
|---|---|---|
1.Sukhnandan Son of late Bishal Chandrakar, aged50 years, |
ab |
out |
2.Bhushan son of late Bishal Chandrakar, aged aboyears, |
ut |
38 |
3.Rohit son of late Bishal Chandrakar, aged aboyears, |
ut |
36 |
4.Puna Bai D/o. Late Bishal Chandrakar, aged aboyears, |
ut |
53 |
5.Urmila Bai D/o. Late Bishal Chandrakar, aged abyears, |
out |
48 |
6.Shail Kumar Son of late Bishal Chandrakar, aged46 years, |
ab |
out |
7.Dulhari Bai D/o. late Bishal Chandrakar, aged abyears, |
out |
42 |
8.Dhal Singh Son of late Puranik Chandrakar, aged48 years, |
ab |
out |
9.Arjun Singh Son of late Puranik Chandrakar, aged40 years, |
ab |
out |
10.Koushilya D/o. Late Puranik Chandrakar,about 55 years, |
a |
ged |
11.Savitri Bai, D/o late Puranik Chandrakar, |
a |
ged |
about 50 years, |
||
Appellants No.1 to 11 R/o. Village Vinayakpur,Anda, District Durg (CG) |
Tah |
sil |
12.Durvasha Son of Manrakhan Chandrakar, aged60 years, |
ab |
out |
13.Rekh Lal Son of Manrakhan Chandrakar, aged56 years, |
ab |
out |
14.Krishna Kumar Son of Manrakhan Chandrakar |
a |
ged |
about 50 years, |
||
15.Janak Bai D/o. Manrakhan Chandrakar, aged58 years, |
ab |
out |
16.Mukund Son of Punit Chandrakar, aged aboyears, |
ut |
50 |
17.Ajit Son of Punit Chandrakar, aged aboyears, |
ut |
58 |
18.Teman Lal Son of Punit Chandrakar, aged abyears, |
out |
55 |
2
19. Gopal Son of Punit Chandrakar, aged about 55 years,
20. Saraswati Bai D/o. Punit Chandrakar, aged about 40 years,
Appellants No.12 to 20 R/o. Village Loharsingh, Tah-
sil Patan, District Durg (CG)
---- ApplicantsVersus1. Gopendra Son of late Bodhan Chandrakar, aged about 32 years,
2. Kamal Narayan Son of late Bodhan Chandrakar, aged about 30 years,
3. Khileshwari D/o late Bodhan Chandrakar, aged about 28 years,
4. Deepmala D/o. late Bodhan Chandrakar, aged about 26 years,
5. Srimati Nirmala Bai Widow of late Bodhan Chandrakar, aged about 54 years,
All R/o. Vinayakpur, Tahsil Anda, District Durg (CG)6. State of Chhattisgarh, Through : Collector, District Office Durg (CG)
---- Non-applicants
For Applicants :Mr.Uttam Pandey, Advocate
For Non-applicant No.6 :Mr.Ravi Bhagat, Dy.G.A.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order on Board
7.4.2021
Proceedings of this matter have been taken-up through
video conferencing.
1. Heard on admission.
2. Second Appeal No.269/2010 has been dismissed for want
of compliance of peremptory order dated 17.9.2020.3. It appears from the records that the order has been
3
complied with.
4. For the reasons mentioned in the MCC, same is allowed
and Second Appeal No.269/2010 is restored to its
original number. Office to verify and proceed further.
(Sanjay K.Agrawal)
Sukhnandan Son of late Bishal Chandrakar & others
State of Chhattisgarh
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court