Gangaram And Anr. v. Prem And Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the learned counsel for the appellants admitted having no instructions in the matter.
Appeal dismissed for want of prosecution as the learned counsel for the appellants admitted having no instructions in the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
NAFR
HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
MAC No. 546 of 2015
------Appellants
VERSUS
------- Respondents
For Appellants : Mr. Animesh Verma, Advocate
Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge
ORDER
16/09/2021
Sd/-
(Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge
Pawan
Gangaram S/o Devnath
Swami Gayanand S/o Swami Advita Nand
Prem S/o Aklu
Parmato W/o Prem
Ranjit Singh S/o Ramsurat
The Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited
Parth Prateem Sahu
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court