The High Court of Chhattisgarh disposed of a criminal revision against an order directing maintenance payment. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous since the respondent had expired during the arguments.</p>
revision petition dismissed and disposed of at motion stage as infructuous due to respondent's expiry
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
-1-
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Cr.R. No. 641 of 2015
| --- Non-applicant | |
|---|---|
| For Applicant | – Mr. Akhtar Hussain, Advocate. |
| For Non-applicant | – Mr. Umakant Singh Chandel, Advocate. |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order on Board
19-01-2021
Heard.
-2-
expired, therefore, the order that is under challenge in this revision petition has now become infructuous, hence, for these reasons, the present petition is dismissed and disposed off at the motion stage.
Sd/-
(Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge
Monika
2 issues framed by the court
Whether a revision petition should be disposed off when the respondent has expired making the impugned order infructuous
How to handle the disposal of a criminal revision that was admitted for final hearing but became infructuous due to respondent's death
Suresh Kumar Jasuja
Meena Jasuja
Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
