Skip to content

The research platform for Indian law — judgements, legislation and the citations between them. Free to search, with the original document behind every result.

A product of LawSathi.

Research

Search Legislation Research tools

Browse

Courts Case types Topics Most-cited judgements Sources

LawSathi

Practice platform Blog

© 2026 LawSathiTerms PrivacyResearch aid, not the official record.

Ajay Verma Vs Ramprasad Satnami — Writ and Judicial Review | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

Home
Chhattisgarh HC
2021
Ajay Verma Vs Ramprasad SatnamiAjay Verma v. Ramprasad Satnami

Dismissed

Ajay Verma v. Ramprasad Satnami

Chhattisgarh HC1 Jul 2021CRMP/854/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the writ petition as infructuous due to the efflux of time. No substantive legal principles were discussed.

What the court decided

AI extract

Outcome

Dismissed

Detailed headnote1 paragraphs

The High Court held that with the efflux of time, the present writ petition has become infructuous and, accordingly, the same is dismissed. No further discussion on legal grounds is provided.

A compact analysis

This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.

A

Page 1 of 1

NAFR

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

CRMP No. 854 of 2017

Ajay Verma S/o G.S. Verma Aged About 45 Years R/o R.D.A. Colony, Tikrapara, Post Office- Raipur, Police Station- Tikrapara, Raipur, Tahsil And District-Raipur. Chhattisgarh

---- Petitioner

Versus

Ramprasad Satnami S/o Gayaram Satnami Aged About 60 Years R/o Village- Ganoud, Tahsil-Arang, Post Office And Police Station- Arang, District-Raipur, Chhattisgarh

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The District Magistrate/collector, Raipur, District-Raipur, Chhattisgarh

---- Respondents

For Petitioner : Shri Shivendu Pandya, Advocate For State : Shri Ashish Gupta, Panel Lawyer

Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas

Order on Board

01.07.2021

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that with the efflux of time, the writ petition has become infructuous.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Sd-

(Narendra Kumar Vyas)

Judge

kishore

Parties & counsel

AI extract

petitioner
Ajay Verma
respondent
Ramprasad Satnami
respondent
State Of Chhattisgarh

Coram

AI extract

Narendra Kumar Vyas

Case details

As recorded by the court registry

Court: Chhattisgarh HC
Decided on: 1 Jul 2021 · July
Registered: 12 Jul 2017
Case no.: CRMP/854/2017
CNR: CGHC010030932017
Topic: Writ and Judicial Review
Bench: Narendra Kumar Vyas
Disposal: DISMISSED

Similar cases

Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court

Finding judgements on the same questions…

More from Narendra Kumar Vyas

Shiv Shankar Agrawal Vs Khamhan Ram Kashyap
30 Jun 2021
Rajesh Soni Vs Mukesh Verma
30 Jun 2021
Ajay Mali Vs State of Chhattisgarh
30 Jun 2021
Shahid Khan, Vs State of Chhattisgarh
1 Jul 2021
Ashok Nayar Vs Jitendra Rampuriya
1 Jul 2021
Dhaneshwar Patel Vs State of Chhattisgarh
1 Jul 2021

Cite this judgement

Ajay Verma v. Ramprasad Satnami, CRMP/854/2017 (CG), decided on 1 July 2021.

The High Court of Chhattisgarh publishes no neutral citation for this judgement — cite it by case number and date of decision.

Bench / Coram

Narendra Kumar Vyas

Parties & counsel