The High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed two petitions (CRMP Nos. 227 of 2014 and 328 of 2015) seeking what is not specified, holding that they had become infructuous due to the efflux of time. The order rendered by the Hon'ble Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas on 09/06/2021 contains no substantive legal reasoning.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Page 1 of 2
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CRMP No. 227 of 2014
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
and
CRMP No. 328 of 2015
---- Petitioners
Versus
---- Respondents
For Petitioner : Mr. Pallav Mishra, Advocate. in CRMP No. 227 of 2014
| Page2of2 | ||
|---|---|---|
| For Petitioner in CRMP No. 328 of 2015 |
: | Mr. Aditya Bhardwaj, Advocate. |
| For State/ Respondent No. 1 | : | Mr. Devendra Pratap Singh, Dy. Advocate General. |
| For Respondent No. 2 in both the petitions |
: | Ms. Nirupama Bajpai, Adv. |
Hon'ble Shri Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas
Order On Board
09/06/2021
Sd/(Narendra Kumar Vyas) Judge
Arun
Prince Mittal And Ors.
State of Chhattisgarh And Priyanka Mittal
Narendra Kumar Vyas
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
