Dismissed

Dhirendra Singh Parihar v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC9 Apr 2021CRMP/322/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

A petition under CrPC to quash a FIR alleging offences under Sections 376 and 450 IPC was dismissed. The court held that the argument was premature as a case for the offences was not excluded, reserving liberty for the petitioner to raise points during framing of charges.

What did the court decide?

The petition stands disposed of with the liberty to raise points during framing of charges.

Dhirendra Singh Parihar Vs State of Chhattisgarh — Quashing and FIR | Chhattisgarh HC (2021)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR

¶4

CRMP No. 322 of 2021

¶5

Dhirendra Singh Parihar, Aged about 48 years, S/o
Jai Pratap Singh Parihar, R/o Jail Colony,
Katghora, Tahsil Katghora, Distt. Korba,
Chhattisgarh.

¶6

--Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State of Chhattisgarh, Through the Station House
Officer, Police Station Katghora, Distt. Korba,
Chhattisgarh.

¶9

 --- Respondent

¶10

For Petitioner :- Mr. S.R.J. Jaiswal, Advocate
For State :- Mr. Animesh Tiwari, Dy. A.G.

¶11

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal

¶12

Order on Board

¶13

09/04/2021

¶14

1.Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit

¶15

that false FIR for offence punishable under
Sections 376 and 450 of IPC has been registered
against the petitioner at the instance of the
complainant and taking the contents of the FIR
as it is, no aforesaid offence is made out
against the petitioner, as such, Crime No.
191/2020 registered against the petitioner at

¶16

¶17

Police Station Katghora, Distt. Korba be
quashed.

¶18

2. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records.

¶19

3. After hearing learned counsel for the petitioner and going through the records, still it cannot be held that no case for offence punishable under Sections 376 and 450 of IPC is made out against the petitioner. Considering the material available on record, the argument made is premature. However, petitioner is at liberty to raise all his points during framing of charges before the trial Court.

¶20

4. With the aforesaid observation, the instant petition stands disposed of with the aforesaid liberty reserved in favour of the petitioner.

¶21

Sd/-

¶22

 (Sanjay K. Agrawal)

¶23

Judge

¶24

Harneet

Dhirendra Singh Parihar v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dhirendra Singh Parihar v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vallurpulli Rajkumar Vs R. R. Industrial Corporation India Limited

Sankalp Sharma Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Shiv Kumar Kurre Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Kamta Prasad Navendra Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Bachhraj Gond @ Bachchhraj Gond Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Pradip Bagh Vs State of Chhattisgarh