In this civil revision, the High Court of Chhattisgarh dismissed the application challenging a Motor Accident Claims Tribunal award of ₹4,170, as it found the case unfit for revision due to the meagre compensation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
Civil Revision No.80 of 2014
HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Limited, Through its Assistant Legal Manager, HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Limited, 205-206 – 2nd Floor, DM Tower, 7, Race Course Road, Indore (M.P.)
(Insurer) ---- Applicant
Versus
(Owner)
---- Non-applicants
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------For Applicant: Mr. N.K. Thakur and Mr. Rohitashva Singh, Advocates. For Non-applicant No.1: -
None present, though served.
For Non-applicants No.2 and 3: -
Mr. Vivek Bhakta, Advocate.
Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal
Order On Board
02/12/2021
2
4,170/- and the finding of the Claims Tribunal that the Insurance Company is liable to make payment of compensation, I do not find it a fit case to entertain the revision. Accordingly, the civil revision is dismissed. No order as to cost(s).
Sd/(Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge
Soma
HDFC ERGO General Insurance Company Limited
Shiv Balak
Vimal Bachhad
Geeta Haldar
Sanjay K. Agrawal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
