The Acting Chief Justice disposed of a contempt petition where the respondent showed a committee report complying with a prior writ order. The court held the applicant must file a fresh petition if aggrieved by the subsequent allocation of work.
The contempt petition is disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
1
CONT No. 554 of 2016
NAFR
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR
CONT No. 554 of 2016
---- Applicant
Versus
---- Respondents
For Applicant :- Mr. C.R. Sahu, Advocate For Respondents :- Mr. Vivek Sharma, Advocate
Proceedings through Video Conferencing
Hon'ble Shri Prashant Kumar Mishra, Ag.CJ Order On Board
02/07/2021
2
CONT No. 554 of 2016
pass the order in accordance with law.
Sd/-
( Prashant Kumar Mishra ) Acting Chief Justice
Ayushi
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the contempt petition is maintainable given that the respondents have demonstrated compliance with the interim order via committee report
Whether the applicant has adduced material to counter the Committee's recommendation to award the work to another agency
Gyatri Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Sakrapali M Through President Smt. Gwalin Bai Wife Of Bhujbal Yadav, Mahila Swa Sahayata Samuh Sakrapali M Village Mohtara N Bl
Priyanka Kiran Pariyojna Adhikari Ekikrit Bal Vikas Pariyojna Bhatgaon, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh
Chitranjan Banjare, Assistant Office Of Pariyojna Adhikari Ekikrit Bal Vikas Pariyojna Bhatgaon, District Baloda BazarBhatapara, Chhattisgarh
Prashant Kumar Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
