Disposed

Shiekh Bani Israil v. State of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh HC7 Feb 2020WPS/841/2020

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner challenged failure in appointing him as a Gazetted Officer despite matching pay scale under 2008 notification. Court directed petitioner to file fresh representation with circular copy for a time-bound decision.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner directed to make fresh representation before Respondent No.1 with copy of circular; to be decided within reasonable time.

Shiekh Bani Israil Vs State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Chhattisgarh HC (2020)

¶1

¶2

NAFR

¶3

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

¶4

WPS No. 841 of 2020

¶5

Shiekh Bani Israil S/o Shiekh Mohboob Subani Aged About 59 Years Posted At Senior Lab Technician At Community Health Center Bilha, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

¶6

---- Petitioner

¶7

Versus

¶8

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶9

Secretary General Administration Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶10

Director Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

¶11

---- Respondents

¶12

For Petitioner	: Shri Atanu Ghosh, Advocate
For Respondents/State	: Ms. Richa Shukla, Dy. GA

¶13

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri

¶14

Order On Board

¶15

07/02/2020

¶16

Heard.

¶17

The only grievance of the petitioner is that the State vide its notification dated

¶18

22^nd of September, 2008 has directed to all the departments that the persons who are working on the pay-scale of 6500-10500/- would be declared as ClassII Gazetted Officer and it is stated that the petitioner is a Lab Technician getting the salary in the pay-scale of 6625-10500, therefore, he would derive the benefit of circular to be appointed as a Gazetted Officer, however, the same is

¶19

¶20

not been done.

¶21

Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner has filed an application before the Secretary, General Administration and the same is not been decided.

¶22

After perusal of Annexure P-2 it is observed that the petitioner shall be at liberty to make afresh representation before the respondent No.1 Secretary, Department of Health and Family Welfare along with the copy of the circular Annexure P-2 dated 22^nd September 2008 canvassing all the grievance and if such representation is filed, it shall be decided within a reasonable time.

¶23

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of.

¶24

Sd/-

¶25

Goutam Bhaduri Judge

¶26

Ashu

Shiekh Bani Israil v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shiekh Bani Israil v. State of Chhattisgarh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prabhat Kumar Verma Vs Surguja Kshetriya Gramin Bank and Ano.

Rupesh Kumar Sharma Vs Pandit Ravi Shankar Shukla and Anr.

Shiv Kumar Sharma Vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Arun Kumar Pathak Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Vikram Singh Vs State of Chhattisgarh

Pramod Kumar Chouhan Vs State of Chhattisgarh